Pope Benedict XIV |
Marina And Yucca |
The two works of art I chose
at the Met Museum are over 300 years apart but show portraits of people. The
First Artwork is titled “Pope Benedict XIV”, it was made in 1746, the medium
used was oil on canvas, the artist’s name is Pierre Hubert Subleyras. The Second
work of art is titled “Marina And Yucca” made in 2012. The medium is Two-channel digital video, color, silent, 3
min., 30 sec. Even though that both are made 3 eras apart they show the same
concept, a person posing. Both Artists captured human beings but in different
times.
The First
work of art is an idealized portrait of the Pope. It has a two dimensional Pope
in his traditional religious clothing. The colors look muted, toned down but
still capturing the religious feel.
The
second work of art is much more different because it is made with two-channel
Digital Video. It is still two dimensional because its still on a screen but
that not the part that makes this interesting the one with the man in the red
shirt you can see slightly moving. Her eyes twitch a little, the breeze ruffles
her hair a bit too. Its almost like she is still for a picture, that is never
going to be taken. The colors are bright, her sweater is bright red and the
surrounding looks like its daylight. “Kydd makes what he calls "durational
photographs"—a paradoxical description signaling the artist’s
dissatisfaction with film’s conception of time. Poised between cinema and still
photography, the pieces only became possible when the resolution of video
imagery had reached a high enough level that a moving image could at least
approach the mesmerizing clarity of the best color photography. Marina and
Yucca is a two-channel piece in which the spiky spray of a yucca plant juts out
toward the viewer, trembling ever so slightly in the California breeze, while
in the other monitor a seated young woman sits immobile with her eyes closed”
(MetMusuem blurb) The description above really captures what the piece was all about.
These two
artworks were made in different eras but the similarity is there. They both
show a person posing, they were both made to represent something either
religion or combining still photography and cinema and they both are set in a museum.
I choose
these two artworks when I setted my eyes on the digital video in the
photography gallery. I loved how to really see the movement you have to stand
and stare at it long enough to catch it. I than headed back to the European gallery,
In search for a portrait of anyone to compare the two eras. Just from the two I
can tell the different technology and materials used and even the different
views of the two Eras. I believe the portrait is In the museum because at the
time that it was made it was considered a work of art and it still is. The painting
clearly shows a religious figure from over 300 years in the past. The Two
digital video is put into the photography gallery because it captures its
viewers with the combination of still photography and cinema.
Grading and comments for this essay are sent via email, grades are posted in BB Grade Center.
ReplyDelete